
There's been a lot of talk about the Smart Grid, but much of the reporting has provided more heat than light (pardon the pun) about what a Smart Grid entails and its feasibility.
Forces arrayed against this mammoth undertaking write it off as another government-funded boondoggle, another waste of taxpayers’ money. Proponents envision a revolution in the way we consume and distribute electricity that will transform our antiquated grid into a Smart Grid that’s as flexible, communal and individual as the Internet.
The truth lies somewhere in between.
The Basics
A Smart Grid is a power system that adjusts based on real-time information from power suppliers, distributors and consumer. It would take a long time to explain the details of the entire networked system; if you're interested in getting a handle on the big picture, check out the Dept of Energy's book on the Smart Grid. For the Cliff’s Notes version, check out the Wikipedia entry.
Proponents envision the entire country rewired into a national Smart Grid where power would come from traditional baseload power generators. Smart power lines would transmit this electricity into smart homes. Producers would be able to monitor in real time how power is being consumed, how efficiently the power is being distributed and how to adjust baseload plants to optimize efficiency. Consumers would have Smart Meters that would show how they're consuming power and recommend adjustments to to their electricity usage.
The national electrical grid is around 100 years old, yet our hunger for electricity has grown exponentially since then. We just moved into a house with that was wired in the 1970s; with the computers, TVs, phone and iPod chargers, dishwasher, lights, etc. humming along, turning on the toaster oven or a blow dryer sends me down to the breaker box.
Expand that personal anecdote to a town, city or region and you get an idea of the infrastructure tightrope we walk as a nation. One false move and everyone is sitting in the dark, business grinds to a halt, data is lost and chaos descends. It's hard to run a 21st century family--or economy--with such an antiquated system.
But building a national Smart Grid is a very daunting task, but regional coalitions comprising industry, government and consumers are banding together to push for smaller, local Smart Grids.
Despite the challenges, some uitlities are agressively moving into Smart Grid and Microgrid pilot projects. Duke Energy (NYSE: DUK), Xcel Energy (NYSE: XEL), San Diego Gas & Electric (AMEX: SDO) and Pacific Gas & Electric (NSYE: PGE) are three examples. Other companies in the space that are worth investigating include Itron (NDSQ: ITRI), Echelon (NSDQ: ELON) and Amercian Superconductor (NSDQ: AMSC).
Many of these companies and others are followed in our newsletter New World 3.0.
GS Early is executive editor of KCI Investing and focuses on emtech/nanotech/cleantech.
There's been a lot of talk about the Smart Grid, but much of the reporting has provided more heat than light (pardon the pun) about what a Smart Grid entails and its feasibility.
Forces arrayed against this mammoth undertaking write it off as another government-funded boondoggle, another waste of taxpayers’ money. Proponents envision a revolution in the way we consume and distribute electricity that will transform our antiquated grid into a Smart Grid that’s as flexible, communal and individual as the Internet.
The truth lies somewhere in between.
The Basics
A Smart Grid is a power system that adjusts based on real-time information from power suppliers, distributors and consumer. It would take a long time to explain the details of the entire networked system; if you're interested in getting a handle on the big picture, check out the Dept of Energy's book on the Smart Grid. For the Cliff’s Notes version, check out the Wikipedia entry.
Proponents envision the entire country rewired into a national Smart Grid where power would come from traditional baseload power generators. Smart power lines would transmit this electricity into smart homes. Producers would be able to monitor in real time how power is being consumed, how efficiently the power is being distributed and how to adjust baseload plants to optimize efficiency. Consumers would have Smart Meters that would show how they're consuming power and recommend adjustments to to their electricity usage.
The national electrical grid is around 100 years old, yet our hunger for electricity has grown exponentially since then. We just moved into a house with that was wired in the 1970s; with the computers, TVs, phone and iPod chargers, dishwasher, lights, etc. humming along, turning on the toaster oven or a blow dryer sends me down to the breaker box.
Expand that personal anecdote to a town, city or region and you get an idea of the infrastructure tightrope we walk as a nation. One false move and everyone is sitting in the dark, business grinds to a halt, data is lost and chaos descends. It's hard to run a 21st century family or economy with such an antiquated system.
But building a national Smart Grid is a very daunting task, but regional coalitions comprising industry, government and consumers are banding together to push for smaller, local Smart Grids.
Gregg Early is vice-president of
KCI Communications and
executive editor of the company’s flagship publication, Personal Finance.
Over
the past decade, he has helped build the newsletter’s reputation as a trusted
source for penetrating market analysis and investment advice that subscribers
can take to the bank. He also oversees the editorial department’s other
award-winning publications.
But Gregg’s responsibilities
and interests are not purely administrative. Always forward-looking, he found
his niche reporting on the frontiers of technology: high-temperature
superconducting, alternative energy, intelligence infrastructure, as well as
advances in the nanotech and biotech sectors. For those willing to follow him
back to the future, he pens The Real
Nanotech Investor, a financial advisory that focuses on how individual
investors can capitalize on innovations in nanotech and disruptive
technologies. Gregg’s free e-zine, New Tech Investor, keeps readers updated on the latest advances and
developments in these nascent sectors and, more importantly, the opportunities
therein.
Prior to joining KCI, Gregg
honed his journalistic chops reporting on a variety of topics including
finance, health care and education. He is also a respected gastronome and chef
as well as a published poet and playwright. He’s a graduate of James Madison
University.
| GS EARLY - BIO | ARCHIVES Executive Editor: Personal Finance Editor: New Tech Investor |
| ELLIOTT GUE - BIO | ARCHIVES Editor: Personal Finance, The Energy Strategist, The Energy Letter |
| ROGER CONRAD - BIO | ARCHIVES Top 3 Dividend StocksEditor: Canadian Edge, Utility Forecaster, Maple Leaf Memo, Utility & Income |
| YIANNIS MOSTROUS - BIO | ARCHIVES Editor: Silk Road Investor, Emerging Markets Speculator |
| GEORGE KLEINMAN - BIO | ARCHIVES Editor: Futures Market Forecaster, Commodities Trends |
![]() | DAVID DITTMAN - BIO | ARCHIVES Editor: Maple Leaf Memo |
![]() | BEN SHEPHERD - BIO | ARCHIVES Free Stock Market Tips Editor: Louis Rukeyser's Wall Street, Louis Rukeyser's Mutual Funds, Friday Market Wrapup |
![]() | HANK HEYMING - ARTICLES |
![]() | BOB CARLSON - ARTICLES |